• 12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: tyres similar to Firestone Roadhawk

Looking for a comparison of Firestone Roadhawk to tyres that are made in similar dimensions? Here you can find detailed information based on tests, reviews and manufacturer's data.

# Firestone Roadhawk
/57%
BFGoodrich Advantage
/62%
Uniroyal RainSport 5
/64%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
/67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
/74%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
/51%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
/83%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
/72%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
/77%

Add to comparison

Firestone
BFGoodrich
Uniroyal
Falken
Firestone
Semperit
Kumho
Hankook
Bridgestone
DimensionsR15 - R21 R14 - R20 R15 - R21 R14 - R22 R16 - R22 R15 - R21 R16 - R22 R13 - R23 R16 - R22
Price
Remove

Let's have a closer look at the performance, pros, and cons of two popular summer tyres; the Firestone Roadhawk and the BFGoodrich Advantage. These tyres are products of renowned manufacturers, Firestone and BFGoodrich respectively.


The Firestone Roadhawk, in our rating, scored a decent 72%. It stands out for its sporty dynamic handling and impressive dry braking, even earning the best grade for efficiency and low wear in some tests. However, it has been shown to struggle a bit on wet surfaces and has come in 10th position in both the Autobild and ADAC tests among 53 and 16 tyres respectively. Additionally, it has been criticized for its higher road noise, a factor that may affect comfort during long drives.


Switching gears to the BFGoodrich Advantage, we see a slightly higher overall rating at 76%. This tyre excels notably in comfort and dry handling. Its positioning in the mutual tests conducted by Autobild and ADAC puts it slightly behind the Firestone Roadhawk, standing at 18th and 10th positions amongst 53 and 16 tyres respectively. However, it too shares a weakness in wet handling and has a tendency to understeer in such conditions. Yet, it has a plus side, as it has a pleasant, quiet rolling noise and lower rolling resistance compared to its counterpart.


Summing up the overall test results, it's clear that both these tyres have their own strengths. If your preference lies with aggressive, sporty handling and optimal performance on dry conditions, then the Firestone Roadhawk has the edge. However, it's worth noting that if ride comfort, quietness and dry handling rank high on your list, the BFGoodrich Advantage may be the better choice for you. It should be mentioned that both tyres display some weaknesses in wet conditions.


Finally, our verdict is based on a multitude of performance metrics and these tyres offer strong competition to each other. Depending on your specific needs and driving conditions, you would be wise to consider these variables when choosing between the Firestone Roadhawk and the BFGoodrich Advantage.

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 7 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

7

Mutual tests

Autobild
Name
Firestone Roadhawk
Rating: Good
BFGoodrich Advantage
Rating: Good
Uniroyal RainSport 5
Rating: Satisfactory
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Rating: Good
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Rating: Good
Bridgestone Turanza 6
Rating: Exemplary
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test35,425,8
Firestone Roadhawk36,628,7
BFGoodrich Advantage37,429,1
Uniroyal RainSport 537,927,7
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun36,528,0
Semperit Speed-Life 339,028,8
Hankook Ventus Prime 435,927,7
Bridgestone Turanza 636,927,9
Show test details
ADAC
Name Enviromental impactDriving safety
Best values in test1,31,8
Firestone Roadhawk
Rating: Good
2,72,8
BFGoodrich Advantage
Rating: Good
2,82,9
Uniroyal RainSport 5
Rating: Good
3,13,4
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Rating: Good
2,72,1
Semperit Speed-Life 3
Rating: Good
2,62,8
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Rating: Good
2,72,4
Show test details
ADAC
Name WetDryNoiseWearFuel consumption
Best values in test1,71,62,711,7
Firestone Roadhawk
Rating: Satisfactory
2,82,23,72,02,4
BFGoodrich Advantage
Rating: Satisfactory
3,02,93,22,52,1
Semperit Speed-Life 3
Rating: Satisfactory
3,02,42,92,01,9
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test35,727,5
Firestone Roadhawk37,732,8
BFGoodrich Advantage36,331
Uniroyal RainSport 538,433,5
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun36,128,2
Semperit Speed-Life 34033,1
Hankook Ventus Prime 435,827,8
Show test details
Autobild
Name WetDryRunning costs
Best values in test1-2+1
Firestone Roadhawk
Rating: Good
2+2+ 3
BFGoodrich Advantage
Rating: Satisfactory
2-2+ 2-
Uniroyal RainSport 5
Rating: Satisfactory
2+2-2-
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Rating: Satisfactory
2-22
Semperit Speed-Life 3
Rating: Exemplary
1- 2-2
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test34,129,6
Firestone Roadhawk35,731,6
BFGoodrich Advantage36,731,9
Uniroyal RainSport 537,432,0
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun35,831,4
Semperit Speed-Life 337,730,0
Show test details